British created Hinduism did not exist at Sage Sankara time. It is necessary to go to the root of the annals of religious history to realize the adulteration of the foreign looters and invaders of our great India. +

British created Hinduism did not exist at Sage Sankara time. It is necessary to go to the root of the annals of religious history to realize the adulteration of the foreign looters and invaders of our great India.

As we peep into the annals with deeper self-search: ~

Almost 1000 (1500bc 500BC) years history of Indian was completely removed or destroyed by historians to impress rulers of the British Raj.

It is time to rewrite history to revive the truth destroyed by the British raj and past political ruled by the selfish political class.

India not only lost its treasure of wealth but also suffered by losing the ancient Santana culture and tradition.

Advaitic wisdom of Sage Sankara makes you remember the lost treasure of the Indian wealth of the highest wisdom.

British created Hinduism did not exist at Sage Sankara time. It is necessary to go to the root of the annals of religious history to realize the adulteration of the foreign looters and invaders of our great India.

As we peep into the annals with deeper self-search: ~

Almost 1000 (1500bc 500BC) years history of Indian was completely removed or destroyed by historians to impress rulers of the British Raj.

It is time to rewrite history to revive the truth destroyed by the British raj and past political ruled by the selfish political class.

India not only lost its treasure of wealth but also suffered by losing the ancient Santana culture and tradition.

Advaitic wisdom of Sage Sankar makes you remember the lost treasure of the Indian wealth of the highest wisdom.

Remember:~

Hinduism is not Sanatana Dharma. Santana Dharma deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its own sacred texts.

Santana Dharma deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its own sacred texts and practices without interlinking it with Hinduism.

As we peep into the annals of religious history: ~

Hinduism came into existence with its own code of conduct beliefs, rituals after the 8th century. Hinduism, as one knows it today, is of recent origin.

The “Hinduism did not really achieve its status as a coherent though still baffling, religious complex until after the establishment of the British rule in India.

Hindus are not in contact with their religious history therefore, they believe their inherited beliefs as the ultimate truth.

Hindu traditionalists refuse to debate whether the Vedic people practiced cow slaughter ate beef. They believe such debate is irreligious.

In discussing the Vedic religion it is also to be remembered that in the course of history, many non-Aryan elements entered into the Vedic religion. The Vedic Aryans freely borrowed elements from the culture and the society around them. But we cannot say with precision, which are the non-Aryan elements in the Vedic Religion.

Therefore, the thesis of the direct ancestry of Hinduism of today from Vedic religion is to be considered as a myth purported by orthodoxy.

Vedic religion or Santana Dharma is distinct from Hinduism. The Vedic religion or Santana Dharma deserves to be treated on its own as a distinct religion with its own sacred texts, rites, rules of social life, beliefs, and practices without interlinking it with Hinduism. Perhaps it is right to maintain that the Mimamsa School which is concerned with the investigation of the Vedic texts, their correct interpretation, and the meticulous performance of the Vedic rituals and ceremonies has preserved and defended a part of the heritage of the Vedic tradition.

Remember:~

As one peeps into the annals of the Indian religious history he finds that some saints in the past introduced the concept of God with attributes but the Yajur Veda says: - Those who worship visible things, born of the Prakriti, such as the earth, trees, bodies (human and the like), in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness. Therefore, all these adulterated add-ons prove that the form and attribute-based concepts are introduced by some sages of the past with a new belief system and code of conduct in the name of Vedas.

Thus, the present version of Hinduism came into existence with its own code of conduct beliefs, rituals from the 8th century onwards. There are diverse beliefs, diverse God and Goddesses, ideologies, customs rituals introduced by diverse founders of diverse caste and creeds. Everyone identifies with his inherited caste.

Vedas say: ~ Rig-Veda 1-164-46 and Y.V 32-1 clearly mention that God is “One”.

The religion of the Veda knows no idols, then why so many Gods and Goddesses with different forms and names are being propagated as Vedic Gods. Why these conceptual Gods are introduced when the Vedic concept of God is free from form and attributes.

The Vedas confirm God is Atman (Spirit), the Self.

Rig Veda: ~ The Atman is the cause; Atman is the support of all that exists in this universe. May ye never turn away from the Atman, the Self. May ye never accept another God in place of the Atman nor worship other than the Atman?" (10:48, 5)

Rig Veda: ~ 'Prajnanam Brahma'- Consciousness is the ultimate reality or Brahman or God in truth.

Do not accept any other God other than the Soul. The Soul is God in truth,  Nothing is real but the Soul, which is present in the form of consciousness. Nothing matters but realize  God in truth. God in truth is everywhere and in everything. Let these words be inscribed in your subconscious.

God in truth is hidden by the illusory universe. God in truth alone is real and eternal and all else is an illusion. 

Brahman is merely a word to indicate the ultimate truth or God in truth.  The ultimate truth itself is God in truth. 

In Yajurveda says: ~

Translation 1.

They enter darkness, those who worship natural things (for example air, water, sun, moon, animals, fire, stone, etc).

They sink deeper in darkness those who worship sambhuti. (Sambhuti means created things, for example, table, chair, idol, etc.) (Yajurveda 40:9)

Translation 2.

"Deep into the shade of blinding gloom fall asambhuti's worshippers. They sink to darkness deeper yet who on sambhuti are intent." (Yajurveda Samhita by Ralph T. H. Giffith pg 538)

Translation 3.

"They are enveloped in darkness, in other words, are steeped in ignorance and sunk in the greatest depths of misery who worship the uncreated, eternal Prakriti -- the material cause of the world -- in place of the All-pervading God, But those who worship visible things born of the Prakriti, such as the earth, trees, bodies (human and the like) in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness, in other words, they are extremely foolish, fall into an awful hell of pain and sorrow, and suffer terribly for a long time." (Yajur Veda 40:9.)

So, Yajur Veda indicates that: ~

They sink deeper in darkness than those who worship sambhuti. (Sambhuti means created things, for example, table, chair, idol, etc (Yajurved 40:9)

Those who worship visible things born of the prakrti, such as the earth, trees, bodies (human and the like) in place of God are enveloped in still greater darkness, in other words, they are extremely foolish, fall into an awful hell of pain and sorrow, and suffer terribly for a long time." (Yajur Veda 40:9.):~Santthosh Kumar